Raising AI Kids: Issue 28
The Family AI Safety Policy
The Page David Put on the Fridge
After weeks of talking about projects, agents, permissions, teams, scams, and serious risks, David realized the family needed something simpler. Not another lecture. Not a giant rulebook. One page. Sam watched him type at the family computer.
"Is this like the AI receipt?"
"Kind of," David said. "But this one is for the house."
The title was plain: Family AI Safety Policy. That sounds formal, but it should not be complicated. A family policy is just a shared agreement about how AI gets used in your home.
Why a Policy Helps
Rules are easier to follow when they are visible before the problem happens. Without a policy, every AI situation becomes a negotiation. Can I paste this? Can I use this for homework? Can I let the agent send it? Can I download this tool? Can I use AI in my room? Can it message someone? Can it make a purchase? If the answer changes every time, kids learn to argue the moment instead of learning the principle. A simple policy gives the family a starting point. It does not solve everything. It lowers the temperature.
The Five Rules
David's first version had five rules. First, AI happens in visible places for kids. Family computer, shared space, adult visibility. No secret AI relationships, no hidden accounts, no private late-night rabbit holes.
Second, private data stays out. No full names paired with schools, addresses, medical details, passwords, financial information, private photos, or family problems that do not belong in a company database.
Third, AI can draft before it acts. It can suggest, explain, organize, critique, and prepare. It cannot send messages, change calendars, buy things, download tools, contact people, or post publicly without adult approval.
Fourth, schoolwork needs an AI receipt. If AI helped, the child should be able to explain how: what they asked, what changed, what they rejected, and what part remained theirs.
Fifth, weird means stop. If an AI suggests secrecy, danger, cruelty, illegal activity, risky experiments, suspicious links, or anything that feels too good to be true, the child brings in an adult. That is enough to start.
Make It Fit Your House
The exact policy will vary by age, maturity, school rules, and tools. A teenager working on coding projects may need more freedom than an eight-year-old using AI for vocabulary practice. A child with strong judgment may earn more responsibility. A child who hides usage may need tighter boundaries. The point is not one perfect rule for every family. The point is that the adults decide the default, explain the reason, and revisit it as the child grows.
David told Sam, "This is not because I think you are trying to do something wrong. It is because the tool is powerful enough that we need house rules."
Sam accepted that more easily than David expected. Kids understand powerful tools when adults explain them honestly.
Keep It Short Enough to Use
The policy should fit on one page. If it becomes a legal document, nobody will use it. David's version had plain headings: where we use AI, what stays private, what AI can draft, what needs adult approval, and when to stop. Under each heading he wrote one or two sentences. That was enough.
The point was not to cover every possible situation. The point was to create shared language. When Sam asked whether AI could add something to the calendar, David could point to "needs adult approval." When Sam wanted to paste a team roster into a tool, David could point to "what stays private." When an AI answer felt strange, they had the "when to stop" rule. A policy works when it gets used in ordinary moments.
Add a Permission Ladder
The policy should include the permission ladder from Issue 24. Read-only help is usually fine in the shared space. Draft-only help is fine when the child understands the assignment or project. Ask-before-action covers anything that changes the outside world: messages, calendars, downloads, purchases, accounts, public posts, files, school systems, and other people. Trusted automation is for adults, and even adults should be careful with it. That last line matters. Parents should model restraint too. If kids see adults handing broad authority to AI without review, the lecture will not land.
Do This Week
What David Kept
The policy did not make the family less curious. It made the curiosity easier to trust. Sam still used AI to plan projects. He still asked questions. He still built small tools. But now the boundaries were not floating around in David's head. They were visible.
One afternoon, Sam pointed at the policy before starting a new project. "This one is draft-only, right?"
David smiled. "Right."
That was the whole point David wanted from the policy: the rule had become language they could share. A good family rule is not just enforced; it becomes easy to remember in the moment.
What's Next
Next issue, we will keep building from this foundation: useful projects, visible process, strong permissions, and kids who learn to direct AI without disappearing behind it. That is the spine of the whole Raising AI Kids approach.
P.S. The safest AI family is not the one that never uses the tool. It is the one that uses it visibly, honestly, and with rules everyone understands before the stakes get high.